Pick the stage that best fits where you are today. We’ll show you the clearest practical starting point.
Scroll down to get started
Pick the one that feels most like your current situation.
You’re winning deals but the frequency is erratic. The issue is usually not the quality of what you offer. It’s the absence of a consistent top-of-funnel motion. Without one, you’re dependent on luck and relationships rather than a process that compounds.
Not just job title and company size. The commercial situation that makes a potential customer genuinely ready for this conversation. Most ICPs are too broad, which makes outreach too generic to land.
LinkedIn, email, or referral. Not all three at once. Pick the one where your buyers are most active and focus on that one, consistently. Sporadic effort across multiple channels produces nothing.
A LinkedIn post writer, an outreach sequence builder, and an ICP research agent can keep the top of funnel moving without it becoming a full-time job. The goal is consistency, not volume.
Write your ICP properly. Not a persona with a name and a photo. A clear description of the commercial situation that makes a founder ready to have this conversation today. That single piece of clarity changes everything downstream.
The bottleneck is rarely headcount. More often it’s either consistency or clarity. People doing the same job in different ways, with different quality, applying different processes. Or they’re falling over each other between handoffs because the processes aren’t mapped out cleanly. More people doesn’t always deliver impact. It just adds layers of complexity on top of messy systems and processes.
Run a simple audit for one week. Most founders are surprised by the results. The gap between what commercial people are hired to do and what they actually spend time on is usually significant.
Call prep, follow-up emails, CRM updates, reporting. These are the activities that consume time but don’t require judgment. They’re exactly what AI handles well, which frees the team for the work that actually moves deals forward.
A quality gate, a consistent briefing approach, a shared call prep format. These are the things that make a team’s work feel like it came from one place rather than five different people.
Ask each person to track their time for five working days, split into three buckets: customer-facing activity, internal gruntwork, and everything else. The results usually make the case for change on their own.
Tools are being used, but in isolation. Each one does its own job, but the intelligence doesn’t travel across the commercial flow. The result is duplication, missed signals, and a stack of tools that each cost time and money, with usage limits getting higher, and returns flattening.
From first contact to won deal to retained client. Most teams have tools clustered at the awareness end and almost nothing at retention. Seeing where the gaps are is the first genuinely useful piece of work.
Usually between marketing activity and sales follow-up, and between the won deal and client onboarding. Information that should travel between stages gets lost at these joins. That’s where the value leaks.
Often two simple shared documents can connect eight or nine separate tools without building anything new. A prospect journey log and a shared content calendar. That’s usually the starting point.
Draw your commercial flow on paper. Mark every tool you currently use. Then mark where the handoffs happen and what information is lost at each one. That exercise alone tends to show you what to fix first.
The most common mistake at this stage is investing before the commercial foundations are clear. More resource amplifies what’s already there, good or bad. If the engine isn’t operating smoothly at this point, adding people or tools now just makes it more expensive to course correct at a later stage. Getting clear on the foundations first is the most valuable thing you can do with this window.
How aligned are they? Can you identify any conflicting goals? Does the activity being done match up to the priorities? Misalignment here is more common than people realise, and it gets more costly the more resource you add on top of it.
Not how you’d like it to work. How it actually works. Where are people coming from, what happens at each stage, where are you losing them? The gaps in that map tell you what to fix before you add resource.
The Commercial Engine Scorecard takes 12 questions and gives you an instant read on where the pressure points are. Worth doing before any significant commercial investment decision.
The Commercial Engine Scorecard takes 3 minutes and tells you exactly where the gaps are. A useful starting point before making any significant commercial investment.
Thirty minutes is usually enough to make it concrete.
Book a 30 minute call with Sarah No pitch, no prep required. Just an honest conversation.